Philosophy of Social Science
Semester 1 2026/2027 | Undergraduate Seminar: Philosophy of Social Science | Seminar | PH3201 | EN | 4-Unit Course | Tuesday 9:00–12:00 | AS1-0303
This seminar examines central debates about explanation, evidence, and method in the social sciences. We begin with the question of whether social science can produce lawlike generalizations, then turn to mechanism-based explanation, micro–macro relations, agent-based simulation, rational choice models, and the role of idealization. The middle part of the seminar focuses on causation, randomized controlled trials, construct validation, and measurement. We then consider newer explanatory frameworks, including network models, cultural evolutionary models, machine learning, and prediction-driven approaches. The final sessions connect these methodological debates to questions about social ontology, especially the analysis of social categories such as race and gender. Throughout the seminar, students will learn to reconstruct philosophical arguments, evaluate the assumptions behind social-scientific methods, and assess when a model, measurement strategy, or causal claim genuinely contributes to understanding social phenomena.
Work required for credits:
1. Reconstruction paper and presentation: Each student will present one assigned weekly reading and submit a reconstruction paper before the seminar. The paper should identify the central thesis, reconstruct the argument, define key terms, develop a critical evaluative line, and include discussion questions. Length: 900–1,200 words. Weight: 30%.
2. Discussant comment: Each student will serve as discussant for one presentation. The comment should respond directly to the presenter’s reconstruction and critique, either by correcting, defending, strengthening, or redirecting the discussion. Length: 1–2 pages max. Weight: 15%.
3. Final paper: Each student will write a final paper on an issue in philosophy of social science covered in the seminar. The paper should advance a clear thesis, engage substantively with at least two syllabus readings, anticipate a serious objection, and include a reference list. Length: 3,000–3,500 words. Weight: 55%.
Ivan Gonzalez-Cabrera 